14.4 RETAIL THEFT

Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.

Instrucción
14.4
Ley
§ 812.015(8)(c), Fla. Stat.*
Edición
Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026
Fuente oficial
The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado

Elementos

Texto oficial en inglés

Copiado palabra por palabra del texto oficial. Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026.

To prove the crime of Retail Theft, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant)

Give one or more as applicable.

a. took possession of or carried away [merchandise] [property] [money] [negotiable documents] from a merchant.

b. altered or removed a [label] [universal product code] [price tag] from merchandise.

c. transferred merchandise from one container to another.

d. removed a shopping cart from a merchant.

2. (Defendant) did so with the intent to deprive the merchant of possession, use, benefit, or full retail value of the [merchandise] [property] [money] [negotiable documents] [shopping cart].

3. (Defendant) [, acting individually or in concert with one or more other persons,] did so from more than one location within a 120-day period, and the total value of the [merchandise] [property] [money] [negotiable documents] [shopping cart] when added together was $750 or more.

Determinaciones adicionales

Texto oficial en inglés

Determinaciones especiales, agravantes, inferencias y excepciones que la instrucción da cuando corresponden, palabra por palabra.

Give if applicable. Firearm. § 812.015(11), Fla. Stat. Retail Theft is bumped up to first degree felony if the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of the crime.

You must also determine whether the State prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of the Retail Theft.

Prior conviction. It is error to inform the jury of a prior Retail Theft conviction. If the charging document contains an allegation of Retail Theft convictions, do not read that allegation, and do not send the charging document into the jury room. If the defendant is found guilty of Retail Theft, the historical fact of previous convictions must be determined beyond a reasonable doubt in a bifurcated proceeding. State v. Harbaugh, 754 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 2000). As of November 2024, it was undetermined whether a conviction requires an adjudication of guilt for purposes of the Retail Theft statute.

Now that you have found the defendant guilty of Retail Theft, you must further determine whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was previously convicted two or more times of Retail Theft under either § 812.015(8), Florida Statutes, or § 812.015(9), Florida Statutes.

Delitos menores incluidos

Texto oficial en inglés

Tal como los enumera la instrucción, palabra por palabra.

RETAIL THEFT —— 812.015(8)(c)

CATEGORY ONECATEGORY TWOFLA. STAT.INS. NO.
Grand theft812.014(2)(c)14.1
Petit theft — first degree812.014(2)(e)14.1
Petit theft — second degree812.014(3)(a)14.1
Theft of a shopping cart506.513--
Attempt777.045.1

Página de práctica relacionada

Defensa en Casos de Hurto en Miami

Fuente oficial: The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado

Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.

Solicitar ConsultaConsulta Llame 24 horasLlamar 24/7 (305) 209-0384 WhatsApp