14.2 DEALING IN STOLEN PROPERTY (FENCING)
Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.
- Instrucción
- 14.2
- Ley
- § 812.019(1), Fla. Stat.
- Edición
- Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026
- Fuente oficial
- The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado
Elementos
Texto oficial en inglés
Copiado palabra por palabra del texto oficial. Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026.
To prove the crime of Dealing in Stolen Property (Fencing), the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. (Defendant) [trafficked in] [endeavored to traffic in] (property alleged).
2. (Defendant) knew or should have known that (property alleged) was stolen.
Determinaciones adicionales
Texto oficial en inglés
Determinaciones especiales, agravantes, inferencias y excepciones que la instrucción da cuando corresponden, palabra por palabra.
If you find that the State has proven both theft and dealing in stolen property, you must then decide whether both offenses were in connection with one scheme or course of conduct. “One scheme or course of conduct” means that there was no meaningful disruption of the defendant’s conduct by either an interval of time or a set of circumstances.
If you find that both theft and dealing in stolen property were proven by the State, and the offenses were in connection with one scheme or course of conduct, then the defendant must be convicted of either theft or dealing in stolen property. In making your decision, you must determine whether the defendant is more of a common thief or more of a trafficker. This determination rests on the defendant’s intended use of the stolen property. The defendant is a “common thief” if [he][she] had the intent to appropriate the property to [his] [her] own use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property. The defendant is a “trafficker” if [he][she] had the intent to traffic in the stolen property. If you find the defendant more of a “common thief,” then you are to find the defendant guilty of theft only. If you find the defendant more of a “trafficker,” then you are to find the defendant guilty of dealing in stolen property only.
Delitos menores incluidos
Texto oficial en inglés
Tal como los enumera la instrucción, palabra por palabra.
DEALING IN STOLEN PROPERTY — TRAFFICKING — 812.019(1)
| CATEGORY ONE | CATEGORY TWO | FLA. STAT. | INS. NO. |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | Grand theft — third degree | 812.014(2)(c) | 14.1 |
| Petit theft — first degree | 812.014(2)(e) | 14.1 | |
| Petit theft — second degree | 812.014(3)(a) | 14.1 |
Página de práctica relacionada
Defensa en Casos de Hurto en Miami
Fuente oficial: The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado
Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.