11.14(b) FAILURE BY A SEXUAL OFFENDER TO COMPLY WITH REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS (FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH [REGISTRATION] [OR] [A CHANGE] OF [EMPLOYMENT] [ENROLLMENT] [VOLUNTEERING] AT AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING)

Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.

Instrucción
11.14(b)
Ley
§ 943.0435(2)(b)2., Fla. Stat. or § 943.0435(4)(e)2., Fla. Stat.
Edición
Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026
Fuente oficial
The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado

Elementos

Texto oficial en inglés

Copiado palabra por palabra del texto oficial. Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, conjunto completo publicado por The Florida Bar, actualizado el 9 de octubre de 2026.

To prove the crime of Failure by a Sexual Offender to Comply with Registration Requirements, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give 1a or 1b as applicable.

1. (Defendant)

a. is a sexual offender.

b. has agreed or stipulated that [he] [she] has been convicted as a sexual offender; therefore, you should consider the sexual offender status element as proven by agreement of the parties.

If the defendant offers to stipulate, the court must accept the offer after conducting an on-the-record colloquy with the defendant. See Brown v. State, 719 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1998); Johnson v. State, 842 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). If there is a stipulation, the court should not give the definition of “sexual offender” or “convicted.”

2. (Defendant) [established] [maintained] a permanent, temporary, or transient residence in (name of county) County, Florida.

Give as applicable. 3a is for initial registration with the sheriff and 3b and 3c are for changes to the initial information.

3. a. (Defendant) was enrolled or employed, whether for compensation or as a volunteer, at an institution of higher education in this state, and knowingly failed to provide the office of the sheriff of (name of county) County with the name, address, and county of each institution, including each campus attended, and [his] [her] enrollment, volunteer, or employment status.

b. (Defendant) was enrolled or employed, whether for compensation or as a volunteer, at an institution of higher education in this state, and knowingly failed to provide [through the on-line system of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement] [or] [in person at an office of the sheriff of (name of county) County] [or] [in person at the Department of Corrections if [he] [she] was in the custody or control, or under the supervision of the Department of Corrections] [or] [in person at the Department of Juvenile Justice if [he] [she] was in the custody or control, or under the supervision of the Department of Juvenile Justice] with any change to the name, address, and county of each institution, including each campus attended, and [his] [her] enrollment, volunteer, or employment status, within 48 hours after the change.

c. (Defendant) knowingly failed to provide the change in [his] [her] (insert relevant statutory item).

Determinaciones adicionales

Texto oficial en inglés

Determinaciones especiales, agravantes, inferencias y excepciones que la instrucción da cuando corresponden, palabra por palabra.

There is no statute for the defense of being misinformed or otherwise prevented from complying with registration requirements, and the case law is silent as to (1) which party bears the burden of persuasion of the affirmative defense and (2) the standard for the burden of persuasion. Under the common law, defendants had both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion on an affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

The Florida Supreme Court has often decided, however, that once a defendant meets the burden of production on an affirmative defense, the burden of persuasion is on the State to disprove the affirmative defense beyond a reasonable doubt (e.g., self-defense and consent to enter in a burglary prosecution). In the absence of case law, trial judges must resolve the issue via a special instruction. See the opinion in Dixon v. United States, 548 U.S. 1 (2006), for further guidance.

If burden of persuasion is on the defendant:

If you find that (defendant) proved (insert appropriate burden of persuasion) that the [office of the sheriff] [Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles] [Department of Corrections] [Department of Juvenile Justice] misinformed [him] [her] or otherwise prevented [him] [her] from complying with the registration requirements, you should find [him] [her] not guilty. If the defendant did not prove (insert appropriate burden of persuasion) that the [office of the sheriff] [Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles] [Department of Corrections] [Department of Juvenile Justice] misinformed [him] [her] or otherwise prevented [him] [her] from complying, you should find [him] [her] guilty if all the elements of the charge have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Delitos menores incluidos

Texto oficial en inglés

Tal como los enumera la instrucción, palabra por palabra.

No lesser included offenses have been identified for this offense.

Página de práctica relacionada

No Registrarse como Ofensor Sexual y Violaciones de Residencia en Miami

Fuente oficial: The Florida Bar: instrucciones penales al jurado

Texto oficial de la instrucción al jurado, reproducido con fines informativos. No es asesoramiento legal; la instrucción que se da en un caso depende de los hechos y del tribunal.

Solicitar ConsultaConsulta Llame 24 horasLlamar 24/7 (305) 209-0384 WhatsApp